RESUMO
Aims: Human exposure to high-altitude and/or low-temperature areas is increasing and cardiac arrest in these circumstances represents an increasing proportion of all treated cardiac arrests. However, little is known about the performance of automated external defibrillators (AED) in these circumstances. The objective of this study is to assess the functional and electrical features of 6 commercially available AEDs in extreme environments. Methods: Accuracy of shockable rhythm detection, the time required for self-test, rhythm analysis, and capacitor charging, together with total energy, peak voltage, peak current, and phasic duration of defibrillation waveform measured after placing the AEDs in simulated high-altitude, simulated low-temperature, and natural composite high-altitude and low-temperature environment for 30 min, were compared to those measured in the standard environment. Results: All of the shockable rhythms were correctly detected and all of the defibrillation shocks were successfully delivered by the AEDs. However, the time required for self-test, rhythm detection, and capacitor charging was shortened by 1.2% (3 AEDs, maximum 12.4%) in the simulated high-altitude environment, was prolonged by 3.6% (4 AEDs, maximum 40.8%) in the simulated low-temperature environment, and was prolonged by 4.1% (5 AEDs, maximum 52.1%) in the natural environment. Additionally, the total delivered energy was decreased by 2.5% (2 AEDs, maximum 6.8%) in the natural environment. Conclusion: All of the investigated AEDs functioned properly in simulated and natural environments, but a large variation in the functional and electrical feature change was observed. When performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in extreme environments, the impact of environmental factors may need consideration.
RESUMO
Objective. Respiration is one of the critical vital signs of human health status, and accurate respiratory monitoring has important clinical significance. There is substantial evidence that alterations in key respiratory parameters can be used to determine a patient's health status, aid in the selection of appropriate treatments, predict potentially serious clinical events and control respiratory activity. Although various approaches have been developed for respiration monitoring, no definitive conclusions have been drawn regarding the accuracy of these approaches because each has different advantages and limitations. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of three non-invasive respiratory measurement approaches, including transthoracic impedance (IMP), surface diaphragm electromyography-derived respiration (EMGDR) and electrocardiogram-derived respiration (ECGDR), and compared them with the direct measurement of airflow (FLW) in 33 male and 38 female healthy subjects in the resting state.Approach. The accuracy of six key respiratory parameters, including onset of inspiration (Ion), onset of expiration (Eon), inspiratory time (It), expiratory time (Et), respiratory rate (RR) and inspiratory-expiratory ratio (I:E), measured from the IMP, EMGDR and ECGDR, were compared with those annotated from the reference FLW.Main results. The correlation coefficients between the estimated inspiratory volume and reference value were 0.72 ± 0.20 for IMP, 0.62 ± 0.23 for EMGDR and 0.46 ± 0.21 for ECGDR (p< 0.01 among groups). The positive predictive value and sensitivity for respiration detection were 100% and 100%, respectively, for IMP, which were significantly higher than those of the EMGDR (97.2% and 95.5%,p< 0.001) and the ECGDR (96.9% and 90.0%,p< 0.001). Additionally, the mean error (ME) forIon,Eon,It,EtandRRdetection were markedly lower for IMP than for EMGDR and ECGDR (p< 0.001).Significance. Compared with EMGDR and ECGDR, the IMP signal had a higher positive predictive value, higher sensitivity and lower ME for respiratory parameter detection. This suggests that IMP is more suitable for dedicated respiratory monitoring and parameter evaluation.
